Doors of Perception 4   S P E E D   - D A Y   B Y   D A Y -

Doors4 Diary
by Jules Marshall and Jouke Kleerebezem



Thursday 8 November: Sessions 2, 3, and Panel Discussion



Introduction Welcome Session 1: Speed Made Visible
Session 2: Why Speed Matters Session 3: Europe at Speed Panel: Europe at Speed
Session 4: Changing Speed Session 5: Design for Different Speeds Final Debate
. The Party .



Session 2: Why speed matters: ecology and sustainability

With Wolfgang Sachs we entered the ecological session of the 1996 Doors conference, on Speed. He had five stops on his tour: Body and Code, Colliding Time, Colonising, Speed and the Good Life, Selective Slowness as a Design Virtue.
Body and Code -- witnessing the fiery dragon in front pulling the railway, the idea of tireless power (cf. horse) settled. It transcends organic nature, unhindered by landscape or fatigue. The consequence is infinite growth of speed culture. The 'mobilisation of carbon and oil' is a radical break giving way to the conflict of industrial versus biological time.
Colliding Time -- the body sustained by the metabolism of food and excretion of waste. Similarly society, except metabolism and waste are speeding up beyond sustainability. We're using fuel that took millions of years to be created each year. We force-feed factory animals to speed up their natural cycle. The result is turbulence. A clash of time scales.
Colonising -- the 'speed to spill' means colonising the future: like mines were used to gather precious minerals, they turned into landfills after their depletion. Increasing speed means acting out power: since power to man is power over man, the power to spill evokes the question of justice, while today's generation has power over future ones. How much 'nature' are we permitting ourselves to move (like in mining) to keep up with the needs and speeds of informational technological culture? IT industry hopes at no cost to nature from its activity. There's no smoke and fumes, true, but the electronic equipment is much more expensive than was assumed in terms of amount of nature needing transformation. A Wupperthal Institute study showed that one PC needs 15-19 tonnes of energy and material over its lifetime -- cf. the car, which uses 25 tonnes. Be wary of eco-optimism.
Speed and the Good Life -- the paradox of time saving machines is that we have less time. Cars save time, but drivers don't spend less time in traffic than non-drivers. Time gained is invested in consumption, so acceleration bears congestion -- as much as, or even more than that it enhances the good life, it undermines it. Life in the fast lane is socially and environmentally unsustainable. Acceleration drives growth, driving more acceleration -- it's epidemic.
Selective Slowness as a Design Virtue -- speed promised a bright future to a slow 19th century populace, now the opposite is needed. 'Unhurriedness' -- maybe design a maximum speed of 120 kph into cars? The same for high speed trains, thanks to the disproportionate use of fuel over 200 kph. Since the telephone, it's been recognised that online communication and the emergence of online community does not substitute for transportation needs. Some needs will be replaced by new ones, but we must slow our speed to avoid an avalanche caused by IT.

Wolfgang Sachs and Juliet Schor

W. Sachs and J. Schor


Juliet Schor, like Wolfgang Sachs before her, reminds her audience that time gained in the production, transportation and communication process generally is not used in leisure, but to acquire yet more goods. This is caused not by technology but a social effect, especially of changing work patterns. There's increased dual wage-earning households, more women working, esp. in US, UK and Japan, but increasingly mainland Europe. Meaning more stress, burnout, a demand for convenience in food, ATMs. The connection to ecology is that speed-intensive is nearly always more damaging than time-in
Future production gains will be translated into more leisure -- we will need to produce time and more time. Previously, since the war, all productivity gains have been translated into the purchase of more goods and services -- the work-and-spend cycle. As we now appreciate, this does not increase happiness or well-being, which is coming from relative standing in society. Happiness is poorly correlated with wealth. In the US, millions already are in the 'money for time' trade: calling themselves 'downshifters', who decrease their income, to gain quality time. Not motivated necessarily by eco considerations, but the excessive pace of life and loss of control. 28% of Americans in the period 1990-95 claimed to have made voluntary changes resulting in less income (especially among the 18-40s, and well-educated). Schor disagrees with Kern that we always choose speed.

Juliet Schor and Wolfgang Sachs

J. Schor and W. Sachs


How to connect these data to design? According to Schor, design could bring back the low end of the market, where simpler and more durable goods are to be produced in several ways: develop less expensive versions of existing products; stop upscaling; aim at durability instead of novelty; reposition function over symbolism (i.e. less ads).

Jacqueline Cramer leads R&D at the Philips 'Visions for the Future' program, experimenting in durable products. We know speed trends are wrong, so we must re-orientate a downward spiral, upwards. A factor-10 reduction needs change in the minds of consumers and manufacturers. Durability comes in many forms, among which she discussed optimization of the usage period, recycling, repair, modular upgrades, and 'timeless design' to reduce the vagaries of fashion.

Jacqueline Cramer

Jacqueline Cramer


Also the use of products can add to their durability, when leased and/or shared (e.g. car or washing machine). This is becoming even more important when we know that most new products use far less energy than the old models. The standard 26-inch TV consumed 360 watts in the early 70s, only 90 watts today. This is a decreased burden, but had the TV sets of the 70s been more durable, would we have had the innovations? Design needs government support at a societal level for the pioneers of durable, eco-efficiency.



Session 3: Europe at speed

John Adams kicked off this new Doors session graphing world car population. First he quoted (UK politician) Anthony Crossland in the early 70s: 'the working class wants cars and foreign holidays, while the middle class wants to kick down the ladder behind them.' Labour and Tory still agree that it would be electoral suicide to advocate fewer cars.
Cars have increased from 50 million in the '50s to 500 million today -- is this a success? The numbers without cars has increased from 2 billion world-wide to 5 billion. Where will it end? There were 8 million bikes in China in 1992 -- too many says the government: they get in way of traffic! The aspiration is the same as in '70s UK. What can we tell China? That they can't have cars? But the prospect of 6.4 billion cars on the roads by 2020, means 25-lanes bumper-to-bumper around the Equator. We've seen 80% reduction in bike use (UK) since the '50s, a 50% drop in bus journeys, while rail has remained about the same. Daily journeys to work have increased from 5 miles then to 25 miles today and projected to be 60 miles by 2020. Fewer, longer trips will be made. Still the 750 cars per 1000 inhabitants rate of the US is the 'near saturation' goal of the industry for the rest of the world.
All these figures are average, so many are left behind. Political policy is based on the loaded question: 'would you like a car and unlimited air (or Net) travel?' Everyone of course says yes. But we're rarely asked: 'Would you like to live in the sort of world you would get if every wish was granted?'
This would result in: a polarised world of fast lives with low resolution; continuous suburban sprawl; geographical communities giving way to aspatial communities of interest; travel opportunities destroyed and McDonalds everywhere; fragile ecosystems being destroyed; disappearance of street life (in 1971 80% of school kids made their own way to school. In 1991 only 9% -- the main cause: fear of traffic). Also, increasingly Orwellian law enforcement, geographical communities drained of social content, political authority becoming more remote with the eventual end of democracy... so, Adams concluded, 'How about pollsters asking: 'Would you like to live in clean, safe streets where you know your neighbours and your kids can play safely?' I believe the working class would say yes to this too.'

Technologically frustrated, Rem Koolhaas teetered on the verge of grumpy prima donna-ness before settling down and presenting China Syndrom, a fascinating dash through recent urban developments in the Pearl River Delta (takes in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Macao and two others), being all joined up, with architectural mass growing at an explosive speed. Shenzhen has gone from a population of 0-1 million in ten years, 500 square km (or one new Randstad) of urbanisation being added each year. Two thirds of the population is illegally here (with consequences for building), which is seen as investment opportunities rather than architecture.

Rem Koolhaas

R. Koolhaas


'Chinese architects are the most important in the world,' said Koolhaas. But there's only 1/30,000 people -- c.f. US 1/3,000, UK 1/1,800. They do ten times as much, there are ten times fewer and they're paid ten times less: a productivity factor of 1,000. They build in shamelessly baroque glamour. Many buildings are already being adapted while they are being built (bowling alleys in office blocks, etc.). It causes new urban phenomena, ones we have no relation with. Golf courses and theme parks are integral. A 120 km highway on a raised viaduct is being built -- the most extreme construction of the 20th century. An intersection planned for the middle-of-nowhere virtually dictates that a new city will arise here. 'Potemkin Corridors' are being built -- from and to nowhere (at present), not even sure where they will end.
The tabula rasa of this bay's shores creates a new poetry of flatness, where mountains are blown away to fill valleys with their gravel. The fever of building is not necessary provoked by a fever of inhabitation. There's competition for people. Cities remaining largely empty are aggressively advertised, try to outcheap other cities, thematically focus themselves on 24hr golf courses or the history of Europe, and generally aim at competitive maximum difference.
Koolhaas calls his study 'Cities of Exacerbated Difference': new urban entities competing not co-operating, but somehow making a strategic whole. A state of permanent instability -- not as brutal as it seems -- in fact, quite a sensitive and adaptive system.

Presentation of the Virtual Airport project
Four teams in London, Tokyo, NYC and Amsterdam commissioned by Japanese Airlines. The project was presented by four contributors, who each spoke in the name of their teams and gave a short demo of their program for a virtual airport.
Conny Bakker (Amsterdam, the Netherlands Design Institute) -- Schiphol the personal airport, can be accessed at multiple levels using an electronic diary which allows both to book fast forward de-mystified, of the shelf travel or go slow and ecologically correct by airship transport -- the latter's slowness being compensated for by pumping up the on board connectivity volume and new services offered.

Conny Bakker

Conny Bakker


Tadanori Nagasawa (Tokyo) -- an agent-based 'personal purser' provides a comforting sense of crossing borders when it goes out to chase relevant and 'grounded' information along your trip, negotiating with the agents of passing locales, overcoming language and cultural differences, smoothing your dislocational abandon.
Gillian Crampton-Smith (London's RCA) -- aim to heal psychological dislocation of air travel: worry, delay, being separated from natural (lived) time, becoming a package to be processed. The Net allows parallel journey to be made, enabling re-localisation, informing on travel, preparing for arrival. A Virtual Museum of technology, nature, culture.
Tom Klinkowstein (NYC, Pratt) -- left the physical airport altogether by 'super branding' JFK Airport in the realm of the World Wide Web. Air travel has gone from exotic, stylish and desirable to tedious and common in a few decades. jfk.com was thrown into competition with Nike and the likes for world domination as a lifestyle, celebrating 'the difference between where you are and where you want to be'. 'Lagged and loving it'. The airport as university of the future (McLuhan). Fashion, people-tracking (a la Fedex), VR walkthru's... For the children of the super nerds.

Tom Klinkowstein

Tom Klinkowstein


High speed (300-500 kph) trains shrink Europe's distances. Rens Holslag and his team designed a new interface for the collaboration of European rail companies (they're very idiosyncratic; 27 companies with 14 navigation systems, mostly mechanical and incompatible), as a contribution by Dutch Rail to the improvement of the international traffic system, managed by the European Traffic Management Centre, established in 1991.
Starting from the drivers' perspective, a cockpit simulator sported computer take-over when the driver would fail to reduce speed in time, electronic distance vision to respect the train's 8 km (16 if headlong towards other) braking distance (at 350 kph), and various information from outside and inside the train on display. More trains on the tracks means more intelligence on board. Longer trips are planned with the same driver, with less knowledge of routes.
The project developed new principles, such as a braking curve, and the ideal driver, electronically 'projected' in front of the actual train. The team built a 1:1 scale simulator and went on the road around Europe showing it.



Europe at Speed panel

European Parliament member Elly Plooy-van Gorsel claimed for politics the realisation that IT is vital, and the speed of change getting faster. How do we ensure a soft landing? Claude Gaignebet ('I don't drive, spend most of my time with Rabelais and Plato, I sleep on the train and don't know the English for computer'). 'After 100 hours work a year(...), all I have to do is concentrate on remaining free.' And to Elly Plooy, a personal question: 'how long does it take you to wash a salad?' Confusion, laughter. 'One minute'. No: 'It depends. Urgency is dangerous and time consuming. Time is not linear but a pendulum, according to Plato's Politics.' Rem Koolhaas was accused of being seduced by the apocalyptic vision of speed. Surrender of control. 'Am I frightened? That's irrelevant. Clinical observation is my goal,' he replied. 'Europe should be a symbol of the Old World, we should concentrate on living well, how we know, make beautiful things and be beautiful beings.' 'But can we be clinical?' asked Wolfgang Sachs. 'That's prostitution. I found the presentations, such as the free access to Bombay (Amsterdam Virtual Airport swallowed Bombay into a personal diary) obscene.' 'Compare with 19th century Utopianism, re-born in software engineers. A removal of all constraints and resistance (physical and psychological). We must cherish resistance if we want surprise, as well as eco-balance.'



Introduction Welcome Session 1: Speed Made Visible
Session 2: Why Speed Matters Session 3: Europe at Speed Panel: Europe at Speed
Session 4: Changing Speed Session 5: Design for Different Speeds Final Debate
. The Party .



original photographs: Wendela Smit

e-mail:editor@doorsofperception.com
updated 20-11-1996